Remove topic supreme-court
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Integrity and the Midterm Elections

Policy Chats

In this episode, Former District Attorney of San Bernardino County Michael Ramos talks with students from the UC Riverside School of Public Policy about the Supreme Court going into the upcoming elections. About Michael Ramos : Michael A. Wade and the response by the American public. “My About Michael Ramos : Michael A.

Voting 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Integrity and the Midterm Elections

Policy Chats

In this episode, Former District Attorney of San Bernardino County Michael Ramos talks with students from the UC Riverside School of Public Policy about the Supreme Court going into the upcoming elections. If it does, then that tells you that the decision by the United States Supreme Court lit a fire under the public.”.

Voting 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

County Legal Authority to Fund Non-Mandated Social Services Programs

Community and Economic Development Program of UNC

153A-255 Few North Carolina court cases have addressed a county’s authority to fund non-mandated social services programs pursuant to G.S. 86 (1979), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that G.S. 86 (1979), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that G.S. The court limited the application of G.S.

article thumbnail

COVID-19: The Constitutionality of the Shutdown (with Greg Stepanicich)

Policy Chats

and there the Court upheld a requirement that all adults in the state had to be vaccinated against smallpox” - Mr. Stepanicich on the topic of rules and regulations that are enforceable during these unprecedented times “We end up relying on a Supreme Court case that goes way back to 1905 and it was a case involving Massachusetts and smallpox.

article thumbnail

COVID-19: The Constitutionality of the Shutdown (with Greg Stepanicich)

Policy Chats

Mr. Stepanicich on the topic of rules and regulations that are enforceable during these unprecedented times. “We We end up relying on a Supreme Court case that goes way back to 1905 and it was a case involving Massachusetts and smallpox.

article thumbnail

Lessons from 2023 VAD Academy: Systemic Racism is a Root Cause of Vacant Properties

Center for Community Progress

Although the Supreme Court ruled race-based zoning ordinations unconstitutional in Buchanan v. Subscribe to our mailing list so you don’t miss out on other free educational webinars and check out our YouTube channel to see recordings of past webinars on a variety of topics. Couldn’t join us at VAD Academy this year?

2023 98
article thumbnail

Local Government Support for Privately Owned Affordable Housing

Community and Economic Development Program of UNC

Every expenditure must therefore serve a constitutional public purpose, and the North Carolina Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of what does or does not serve a public purpose. As Frayda Bluestein explains in her blog post on the topic, the North Carolina Supreme Court expounded on the exclusive emoluments clause in Brumley v.