by Yao Liu, Eduardo Araral, Jiannan Wu
Do policy makers in China care about public opinion? Our recent article published in Policy & Politics demonstrates that Chinese governments effectively address public demands, especially on environmental issues, using online petition data and fiscal expenditure records.
We focused on a relatively new channel for assessing public opinion, namely online petitioning via official platforms. These represent a new tool for public expression, distinct from more traditional institutionalized and non-institutionalized channels. On the one hand, compared to traditional petitioning, they provide greater accessibility. As long as there is internet access, members of the public can easily leave online messages. On the other hand, compared to public opinion expressed on social media, online petitioning is subject to specific regulations and demonstrate a certain level of official moderation, rather than relying solely on unmoderated input from the public.
Response agencies, the department within local government responsible for collecting and responding to these public opinions, bridge the gap between the public and policy makers and act as a “transit point” to help organise the process of converting public opinion into policy action. Using a theoretical framework that analysed the roles of different response agencies in converting public opinion into policy action, we focussed on two dimensions: political authority and interest homogeneity. Specifically, policy responsiveness improves significantly when government response agencies demonstrate a high level of political authority and share homogeneous interests with citizens.
Our research provides new evidence of policy responsiveness in Chinese local governments and emphasises the need to incorporate administrative perspectives when examining policy responsiveness. At the same time, we call for further global research on the role and influence of official online petition platforms. With the development of official online petition platforms worldwide, these have become an important daily interaction tool for citizens and government.
You can read the original research in Policy & Politics:
Liu, Y., Araral, E., & Wu, J. (2024). Policy responsiveness and its administrative organisation in China. Policy & Politics (published online ahead of print 2024). Retrieved Apr 24, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2023D000000015
If you enjoyed this blog post, you may also be interested to read:
Chen, C. (2023). Policy responsiveness and media attention. Policy & Politics, 51(3), 602-625. Retrieved Apr 24, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16841402132985
Mishor, E., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2023). Exploring civic engagement dynamics during emergencies: an empirical study into key drivers. Policy & Politics, 51(4), 718-740. Retrieved Apr 24, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16886470793447
Policy & Politics Journal Blog 